Association of COVID-19 Visitor Limitations and Goals of Care Discussions in the Intensive Care Unit.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to visitor restrictions in many hospitals. Since care in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) often engages visitors as surrogate decision-makers, we investigated whether there was an association between COVID-19-related visitor restrictions, goals of care discussions (GOCD), and patient outcomes in SICU patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of trauma and emergency general surgery (EGS) patients admitted to a rural tertiary SICU between July 2019 and April 2021, dividing patients into those admitted during COVID-19 visitor restrictions and those admitted at other times. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we compared the primary outcome, incidence of GOCD, and incidence of prolonged hospital (> 14 d) and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS, > 7 d) between the two groups. RESULTS: One hundred seventy nine of 368 study patients (48.6%) presented during restricted visitation. The proportion of GOCD was 38.0% and 36.5% in the restricted and nonrestricted visitation cohorts, respectively (P = 0.769). GOCD timing and outcomes were similar in both groups. The use of telecommunication increased during restricted visitation, as did the proportion of trauma patients admitted to the SICU. On multivariable logistic regression, age and patient category were independent predictors of GOCD. On outcomes analysis, visitor restriction was associated with prolonged hospital LOS for EGS patients (odds ratio 2.44, 95% confidence interval 1.01-5.91, P value 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Restricted visitation was not associated with changes in frequency or outcome of GOCD, but was associated with prolonged hospital LOS among EGS patients who had SICU admissions. Further investigation of patient/surrogate satisfaction with virtual GOCD in the SICU setting is needed.

Commonalities among Dietary Recommendations from 2010 to 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Meta-Epidemiological Study from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide recommendations to clinicians based on current medical knowledge to guide and reduce variability in clinical care. With advances in nutrition science research, CPGs increasingly include dietary guidance; however, the degree of consistency in dietary recommendations across CPGs has not been investigated. Using a systematic review approach adapted for meta-epidemiologic research, this study compared dietary guidance from current guidelines developed by governments, major medical professional societies, and large health stakeholder associations owing to their often well-defined and standardized processes for guideline development. CPGs making recommendations for dietary patterns and food groups or components for generally healthy adults or those with prespecified chronic diseases were eligible. Literature from January 2010 to January 2022 was searched in 5 bibliographic databases and augmented by searches in point-of-care resource databases and relevant websites. Reporting followed an adapted PRISMA statement and included narrative synthesis and summary tables. Seventy-eight CPGs for major chronic conditions (autoimmune, 7; cancers, 5; cardiovascular-related, 35; digestive, 11; diabetes, 12; weight-related, 4; or multiple, 3) and general health promotion (n = 1) were included. Nearly, all (91%) made dietary pattern recommendations, and approximately half (49%) endorsed patterns centered on plant foods. Overall, CPGs were most closely aligned in promoting consumption of major plant food groups (vegetables = 74% of CPGs, fruit = 69%, whole grains = 58%), whereas discouraging intake of alcohol (62%) and salt or sodium (56%). CVD and diabetes CPGs were similarly aligned with additional messaging to consume legumes/pulses (60% of CVD CPGs; 75%, diabetes), nuts and seeds (67%, CVD), and low-fat dairy (60%, CVD). Diabetes guidelines discouraged sweets/added sugars (67%) and sweetened beverages (58%). This alignment across CPGs should boost clinician confidence in relaying such dietary guidance to patients in accordance with their relevant CPGs. This trial was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; PROSPERO 2021) as CRD42021226281.

Geographic Coverage and Verification of Trauma Centers in a Rural State: Highlighting the Utility of Location Allocationfor Trauma System Planning.

BACKGROUND: Care at verified trauma centers has improved survival and functional outcomes, yet determining the appropriate location of potential trauma centers is often driven by factors other than optimizing system-level patient care. Given the importance of transport time in trauma, we analyzed trauma transport patterns in a rural state lacking an organized trauma system and implemented a geographic information system to inform potential future trauma center locations. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected on trauma ground transport during a 3-year period (2014 through 2016) from the Statewide Incident Reporting Network database. Geographic information system mapping and location-allocation modeling of the best-fit facility for trauma center verification was computed using trauma transport patterns, population density, road network layout, and 60-minute emergency medical services transport time based on current transport protocols. RESULTS: Location-allocation modeling identified 2 regional facilities positioned to become the next verified trauma centers. The proportion of the Vermont population without access to trauma center care within 60 minutes would be reduced from the current 29.68% to 5.81% if the identified facilities become verified centers. CONCLUSIONS: Through geospatial mapping and location-allocation modeling, we were able to identify gaps and suggest optimal trauma center locations to maximize population coverage in a rural state lacking a formal, organized trauma system. These findings could inform future decision-making for targeted capacity improvement and system design that emphasizes more equitable access to trauma center care in Vermont.